The necessity of meetings in the Syrian case is complementary to the Syrian nation's struggle but what the calculations of profits and losses are among international meetings that try to invent solutions through mutual agreement while ignoring the bitter reality of the Syrian people. The battle occurring between the Russians and Chinese from one side, and the NATO countries, from the other side, created a vision which states that each party wants to protect his ideas and targets through blackmailing the other party. Thus; the solutions will not be rapid and fruitful. The Russians are providing their political and military capabilities for protecting the regime from the fall and are trying to rebuild it through forming a national unity government that has been considered the only outlet by Anan. However, this suggestion will not be implemented due to that it does not match the requirements of the opposition (party) and is considered by the state as an opportunity that provides it with more time for conquering its opponents by force. Accordingly, the suggestion is dead while it is still in its cradle because it does not provide the Syrian people with guarantees and does not condemn the authority or suggest uprooting its highest officials for forming a national government. The Syrian opposition failed to unify its components and this failure provided the regime with the chance of using its arms and bargaining / claiming that the parts of the Syrian nation who are running the battle are terrorists that do not represent more than a little percentage from the citizens. While doing this; the Syrian regime is depending on the opposition's division, weakness and diversion while members of the national Council have two different viewpoints and are treating their disagreements through vain discussions. Even if the Syrian regime strengthens itself by big or middle power allies; any change that leads to unifying the components of the opposition (party) shall strengthen the position of the Free Army and provide security for those who are going to give up the power so that they shall not be charged for the mistakes of others (other people of higher authority in power). This scenario shall pave the way for bigger and more important splits that may weaken the government's fist or grasp in the long run. The suggestion of an international solution for forming a national unity government during a period of a complete year needs an opposing consent from the opposition's side for analyzing it and exploring the availability of positive points in it that serve the opposition's welfare and deprive the authority from claiming that it has accepted what the opposing party has refused. The complex is not due to the variation of the ideas and attitudes between the international community, the opposition (party) and the Syrian government only but, in particular, to the very weak Arab role too, in addition to Turkey which attitude, though of having its own vision, kept less than pushing it towards adopting strategic decisions. The reason for the said weak attitude from Turkey may be due to its membership in NATO which does not authorize any of its members to act alone. In spite of that the Syrian forces dropping down of the Turkish military aircraft, the NATO's attitude, through unified, did not exceed the harsh diplomatic response. He who knows Al-Assad's regime knows well that it does not care for such procedures, not because he's not afraid from them but because it adopted, in the nature of its behavior, killing the people for preserving its authority. This reason pushes the Syrian regime towards considering all possibilities of that its removal by any internal method supported by many parties or by an international intervention should be opposed by the rule it applied as a counter part that suits its behavior and motives for adopting a counter behavior against whoever concerned by the conditions. What have developed the obsession of mutual death and enormous cruelty that reached the level of complete crime are the rise / grow of Syrian people willingness and the Syrian Army's adoption of confronting the attacks of the authority's powers. The direction of this trend means that if Cairo's meeting led to decisions that unified the opposition (party); it shall lead to a comprehensive change that will worry the Syrian authority and puts it in a new dilemma.
