Hardly a day goes by without a news story about the closure of a restaurant, factory, warehouse or a hospital for offenses committed by those facilities related to health and environmental conditions and other specifications. These regulations must be adhered to in order to maintain investment in such businesses, and in the cases of violations the facility becomes a source of danger and must be closed down. The supervisory and regulatory authorities charged with monitoring conditions and whether businesses are following regulations vary and differ. There are committees from Municipal Affairs and sometimes Health Affairs, at other times the Ministry of Commerce. And in spite of the diversity of facilities that are being shut down and the multiplicity of those who initiated the closing process, citizens who read the daily news hardly know anything about these facilities, although citizens are the ones harmed by the services these facilities offer. Any person's life is threatened because of unqualified hospitals or dirty restaurants, and citizens suffer when traders exaggerate prices or cheat on goods. It is not fair that the reputation of those facilities remain protected from defamation while violations have caused their closure. And it is not fair that citizens remain ignorant of who and what is threatening his life and his health. The lack of defaming those who commit major violations only means they have less incentive to exercise restraint from committing these offenses again. Naming them would ensure other facilities do not commit similar offenses.
