The international relations interact based on benefits, and it is a certain thing of the general political concepts, and from this style of close relation that exceeded the traditional norms to coordinating policies and alliances according to the sectarian concept that made the citizen just a store to sell the concept instruments and its morals when alliance between Damascus and Iran was made, then Hezb Allah whose leaders state in a lot of occasions that Lebanon is an extension of the country of Al Wali Al Faqeh. Iran considers its leaders as the teacher of the Arab revolution when Tunisia and Egypt started it, followed by Libya and Yemen. But when the Syrian street moved to meet the other Arab revolutions that became in Iran's viewpoint a Zionist-American conspiracy! Which is a melody that a lot of Arab intellects went away from, and became the scarecrow that is carried by Iran the country before the revolution. If we assume that what is going on in Syria is an external work with a support of countries and agents that antagonize Damascus, then the same thing applies for the Khomeini revolution that was protected by France, while America refused to treat the Shah or take him as a refuge. That means that there is an international conspiracy with the revolution and its leaders, and this it is a product of the enemies works that are characterized with conspiracy!! We don't have in our world those that are waiting for a miracle from the absent Imam to go out of vault and rule the world making a spiritual and political capital for the humanity to meet the divine promise, and no body prevents the Mahdein to accept such believe, but for the thinking to take them to consider the Arab revolutions coming from the Imam's good news then why doesn't it include Syra since it is a part of a virtual world that it will rule according to the awaited promise? Iran's fear of loosing the ally is blowing up the dreams of the Farsi Empire, and perhaps its image that mislead the Arab citizens after their revolution. A recent survey proved that it is a broken body, and that its policies are aggressive, and it came before it honestly reveal its financial and military support to Syria the country and not the citizens. Moreover, the general Syrian viewpoint started stating clearly its enmity to Iran and Hezb Allah together, and perhaps the duality of position in a face that shows Iran carrying the flag of revolutions and rejecting a country or countries of international arrogance, then showing up in an enmity to the Syrian citizens, revealed its shallowness in a bad way for it. The Arab revolutions didn't burrow the thoughts of Khomeini and the guidance of the supreme guide, or the illusions of Najad about Al Mahdi that is coming to the world, where the revolutions are a product of an Arab reality in its content and thinking as well as its work style and origin, because what shocked the world with its speed and success was not taught and planned by Iran so that it steals the others' rights. What is important is that the nature of these peaceful and youth revolutions was not taught by any sector, and didn't carry any slogan of left, right, extremism or middle, but it started from the motivations of the present history with its accelerating turns. The dilemma that is moving in the Arab Shiite surrounding by the return of references to them because Iran eliminated a traditional right, and the fear of this direction that the Farsi references will loose its dominance and making Qom an alternative for Najaf and Karbala, which is a call that started with the Shiite references in Lebanon and supported by the Shiite of Iraq and Gulf, while Iran rejected this direction because it will make it just a Shiite country with its traditions and powers internally only. The rest of those belonging to the doctrine see that its globalism comes from its original Arab origin, and if this call is added to the awaited confrontations on more than one direction then Iran, if it didn't revise its positions and dreams, will be the biggest loser in a world that is surrounding it politically and religiously.
