The sector's fronts remained Baathist, Nasserite, Nationalist and Communist in the days of revolutions, and despite that the leaders that wanted those sectors were imprisoned by military governments but their structure was wobbling between ruling a country and internally disintegrating so that the loyalties were distributed among internal and external parties. What is weird is that although the Nationalists proposals that called for Arab unity, fighting colonialism and breaking away from Eastern and Western thoughts, the conflicts between those nationals became harsher than their outside conflicts despite the convergence in a lot of thoughts. The current Arab pre-revolution stages wasn't established for new sectors that are able to develop or what are remaining of them such as Baathist in Iraq and Syria. What are changed are the authority's outlines without any guarantees that indicate protocol parties because of its anniversary or more since it was established by naïve acts that raise dead slogans. The deputation in Egypt was also criticizing the authority but with the same old ways, and its leaders that inherited its policies remained away from direct relation with the public and growing generations and enhancing its power with new proposals that meet with the changes in our time, which made the public and opinion makers to go for either indifference or for the state party to get more gains. Those who analyze what's taking place in the Arab revolutions express their fears that the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Syria and Jordan are the ones ready to be in charge in any free voting, while in Tunisia the majority will be for the Renaissance Party, and the position of revolutions in Yemen and Libya will support the growth of Al Qaeda as its roots are already there. The Islamic front is the one that has the fast movement and reaching the parliaments due to political and organizational gaps and its closeness with the classes of the society through organized works system, especially the Muslim Brotherhood, which no one denies, whether with or against their ideologies, that their leaders weren't continuously chased, imprisoned, and relocated. But often were the balances disrupted since the overall fight that attracts the majority and leaderships arranged outside the governing spectrum is different than its inside. King Husain was the pioneer in giving Islamists positions that are in direct relation with the public in ministries such as the ministry of education, but it didn't take a long time for the public to go against them, to the extinct that in later voting Islamists were not able to win any ministerial positions for the year of 1991. It is possible that Islamists govern, but it will be different to have a ruling system that doesn't take into account the different religions, nationalisms and general rights and freedoms. And if the believes of any party are not reconsidered then the real practices will knock out any position that doesn't consider the national and his needs.
