Egypt became the story of the international media with its consequent events publicly and governmentally, which affirm its non absence in influencing the surrounding and outer environment. Perhaps the dimensions of the loud interaction is mostly measured by Israel, as the officially accepted and publically imposed fragile peace might be broken by the fronts who rejected all post-war policies after 1973 war. Europe realizes the importance of this country as a partner in the Mediterranean region. There had been historical conflicts and overlaps that starts at the time of the Romans, and lasted until after 1956 war with the Tripartite Aggression. Even the wars with Israel featured with the Arabic existence with their victories and defeats, and callings for calming and peaceful sort out of issues, while the influence of the old continent was not essential in the any part of the region. America has had a strange (Machiavellian) movement; One time they demand a declared step down by Mubarak, and another they poll back calling for key reforms in his authority that would meet the protesters desires, and finally they come to threaten of cutting aided provided for Egypt, with a fluctuation in their situation leading to the creation of an opposing movement from the streets that imposed its existence in the whole process. It seems that the friendship myth can get a fresh perspective if things go counterclockwise. However, fears remain the dynamo of the American movement, because Egypt in more important than the ends of Iran's Shah and the rising of the revolution. That is because its geographical location and historical heritage place it as an unusual side of the quotation in terms of its influence in the region and on the peace process, the its retrieval of the roles it used to play in the political life on the Arab and international levels. Perhaps Egypt founded a feeling of a moment sprung out of the history of the region. The second concern comes if Egypt promotes the equilibrium of the Arabs' power after they forgot their roles against Israel and others, and this the intrinsic point that might storm the fragile policies and situations. This sensitivity on the American and European side comes as a result of the quick shock and its interactions that overlooked the street movement and how it put Egypt atop all concerns. For example, America cannot claim that what happens is the presage of the soft power as part of what it invented after ending the invading policy and turning to political, economical, and psychological pressure, as most of those who moved are not concerned about the whole continent of North America as their concerns are bigger that how big powers act with others. On the Arabic level, everybody started tempting their citizens with frozen solutions; aids, salary increase, calling off customs on basic goods, promises of press rights, free elections, and root political reforms. The way of looking to the Arab people has changed after they had been thought of as a surplus of careless human beings. Now, it has been realized that it is them who translated the revolution of the new Arab generation into a language of direct and spontaneous pressure. We are facing a variable of a consequent shakes. And this time the west cannot put the Soviet east in confrontation, ad Arab Journalists and politicians cannot claim that such movements are conspiracies schemed by the West, because what used to be congestion happened to be an explosion at an undesignated moment of time. It is a matter that will leave big touches on everybody.
