YouTube is posting a film shot in an Israeli pub, a film that Barack Obama should see as it represents a reality denied by its creators. In the pub, young Jews curse Obama on the microphone, heap racist attributes on him, talk about their land, then curse him again with the most derogatory terms. They also threaten him in his capacity as an enemy. In brief, Israel is a neo-Nazi state that combines the most important features of Hitler's Nazism from military expansionism to racism and killing. During the war on Gaza, 80% of the Israelis supported the Israeli killing machine, which left 1,400 Palestinians dead, most being civilians and around half women and children. Every supporter of Israel is similar to it. After I had monitored reactions to Obama's address to Muslims, I chose some of the comments by Likudniks, the lobby group, AIPAC, and radical Jewish groups. Most were similar to the type and standard of comments made by the Israelis in the pub. Speaking for myself, I say that when an Israeli accepts the two-state solution, I will accept it too. When Benjamin Netanyahu or Avigdor Lieberman rejects withdrawal from the occupied territories, I claim all of Palestine which is occupied from the sea to the river. For Israel, which was established on lands stolen from its people, has no roots in history or geography. Thus, when Likudnik Charles Krauthammer says in The Washington Post that the issue is not about the settlements, I say (to the readers and not to him as I cannot talk to him) that the issue is not about settlements indeed but rather about Israel, the illegitimate settlement. Krauthammer wrote on the eve of the speech and afterwards. He reported to the Palestinians and their leaders all that we know of the crimes perpetrated by the Israeli governments, army, and settlers. He claimed that the Palestinians could have established a state after Oslo, but he did not say that the Israeli Right murdered Yitzhak Rabin and that a majority brought Benjamin Netanyahu to power so that he would thwart peace from 1996 to 1999 during Clinton's second term. The Wall Street Journal usually publishes accurate news, but its op-ed page is purely pro-Likud. In a comment on Obama's address, it preserved its Likudnik character and said that the United States worked more than any other country on liberating Muslims from tyranny, from Kuwait to Bosnia and Kosovo, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq. In my opinion, if there had been no oil in Kuwait, its population would have been homeless to date. A year before occupying Iraq, the US had an alliance with Saddam Hussein against Iran. It did not “liberate” Iraq but rather killed a million Iraqis, unleashed terror and triggered a civil war. It continues to kill Muslims in Afghanistan, although I support the war there until al-Qaeda is destroyed and totally defeated. More important, America supports a Nazi state that occupies Palestine and lives on the money of American taxpayers. The pro-Likud and Jewish American National Review Online sent Ms. Mona Charen to Cairo, where she said that Palestinians were not like African Americans and that Mahmoud Abbas was not like Martin Luther King. More important, the neo-Nazis in Israel are not like the humane and kind American people. In fact, they kill women and children every day and occupy Palestine by military force and US support. The magazine organized in the US a symposium to invite comments on the speech. While a few were acceptable, many were as vile and radical as the sponsoring magazine. In sum: - Jeffrey Azarva said that Obama did not exert enough pressure and asked for democratic governance. I tell him that democracy will bring governments that are more hard-line towards Israel and its existence. - Angelo Codevilla said that the US gave billions of dollars to the Muslim world as many Muslims succeeded in killing many Americans. I believe that this guy is not a lunatic but thinks that people are. The US finances the Israeli murder machine. The Bush administration killed more than a million Muslims from Iraq to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Killing is still ongoing. - David Gelernter claimed that the US did not cause any harm to Muslims around the world. I refer him to my above reply. - Joshua Muravchik said that Al-Azhar accepts Muslims only although Copts make up 10% of the Egyptian population and pay 10% of taxes. I say that this man, about whom I have previously written, is good at earning the enmity of the Arabs and Muslims. As a matter of fact, the Copts in Egypt earn a higher income than Muslims. The persecution of any minority in any Arab country is a myth. For the majority is also persecuted with the lack of democracy; therefore, all are persecuted. I have run out of space here. I hope that Obama saw the YouTube film so that he understands the truth about Israel and the Israelis. http://www.j-khazen.blogspot.com/
