Before I begin, I beg the religious Muslim readers to spare me their religious views since my topic today is a political commentary based on what is known and accepted from ancient history as it is taught in universities around the world, as I personally studied it in the American Georgetown University and my son in the British Oxford University. I am a believer and accept to be held accountable by my God and not by any reader. The Israelis returned from the Jewish Passover holiday and went back to their sacrilege, fabrications and lies to God and its worshipers, considering that Passover which is followed by the Feast of Unleavened Bread celebrates their exit from the “House of Bondage” in Egypt according to the Book of Exodus and their stay for forty years in Sinai before they moved to the land of Canaan, i.e. Palestine, and killed men, women and even newborn children based on the Book of Joshua, which is exactly what they are doing today as well. I accept religions as they are and without arguing, but my topic today is based on history (and geography), not religion, which is why I say that the Jews are celebrating something that never happened. Indeed, there is nothing in history proving that they lived in Egypt or in Sinai, knowing that Moshe Dayan and Jewish archeologists searched in Sinai for thirteen years after its occupation without finding traces of any Jews (They are still searching for such proof in Jerusalem, but to no avail, and some of them even wrote about it and acknowledged it). Maybe I would have disregarded the entire issue, and indeed did disregard it last month, but then decided to go back to it with the resumption of the publication of Israeli newspapers after their holiday. Last month, the Sunday Times carried a report by Jonathan Foreman over six pages and featuring many images, criticizing the New York-based Human Rights Watch for criticizing Israel. Two days ago, the Israeli newspapers which I usually read translated into English resurfaced, and I saw on the first page of the daily report of Ma'ariv a campaign launched by Ben-Dror Yemini against the London-based Amnesty International, also for criticizing Israel. The entire world is criticizing Israel, which has stolen the lands of the Palestinians and whose fascists in the Israeli government of crime are still stealing them until this very day. This is due to the fact that the previous sympathy felt toward the victims of the Holocaust has dissipated after they started perpetrating Nazi crimes against the Palestinians while calling the resistance terrorism, knowing that they are the fathers and mothers of terrorism and the first ones to have launched it in the Middle East region. When the United Nations General Assembly, the Human Rights Committee, Scandinavian ministers and Christian churches in America and Europe criticize Israel, no neo-Nazi or Likud follower disguised in the robe of the Holocaust can claim that Israel is the only one that is right and that the whole world is wrong. Once again, I would perhaps have disregarded the entire issue despite the arrogance of Israel's apologists who criticize the whole world while refusing to criticize an occupying and criminal state, had Jonathan Foreman's report and Ben-Dror Yemini's opinion not converged towards a noticeable point, when the first said that Marc Garlasco got laid off from the Human Rights Watch organization after he turned out to be collecting memorabilia going back to the era of the Third Reich and the Nazis and when the second said that Gita Sahgal was ousted from Amnesty International for having opposed the organization's dealings with Moazzam Begg, who is ideologically linked to the Taliban. Were the report and the article connected through telepathy or through identical sources, or did the two authors dig into the joint basin of Israeli debauchery? I say, as clearly as possible, that had there been a thousand Garlascos in Human Rights Watch and a thousand Beggs in Amnesty International, Israel would still have remained a state of occupation, crime and murder and would still have stolen the lands of the Palestinians. The same goes for Yemini's talk about punishments and the chopping of hands, since all of that does not annul Israel's crimes. After carrying the article of the impudent Ben-Dror Yemini who participated in the Mimouna festivities with the inhabitants of the Maale Adumim settlement, and this celebration is also another superstition, they annexed the announcement: “We will continue to build in Jerusalem” at the end of it. However, they are building for the Palestinians since the land will return to its owners, while Israel in its entirety is an illegal outpost until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state which will grant it legitimacy. Therefore, there are no “illegal settlements” or “outposts” because they are all illegal in the face of the legitimate Palestinian right and the new way the world perceives Israel. One last thing: At the beginning of his investigative report, Jonathan Foreman mentioned that the Human Rights Watch organization is one of two organizations considered to be the most prominent at the level of the defense of human rights around the world, knowing that the second is Amnesty International. They are considered as such because they criticize Israel as it deserves and criticize the Arab countries, also as they deserve. As for Nazi Israel's crime today, it is much greater, from lying to God and its worshipers to killing the women and children. [email protected]
