The issue of using lethal weapons by the Syrian regime and using them for targeting the Syrian citizens through the barrels thrown by the aircraft has returned once again. At this time, it has been said that chemical residues other than the deadly sarin gas can be manufactured and not be classified as chemical weapons. In this regard, some information have been leaked about that the manufacturer are Iranian plants. In spite of that the issue is still in the beginning; The famous American journalist Simon Hirsch who revealed the "My Lai" American Massacre in Vietnam commented on this issue recently through accusing the party who used the chemical weapon in the "Eastern Ghouta" with this current usage through stating that this weapon is not identical with the one being possessed by the Syrian regime. In this regard, he has accused the Turkish government in public, through the American intelligence documents, of that it is involved in the attack for pushing Obama towards the red line. However, there is a ring which is still missed as Libya used to possess such weapon and it has been said that a part of it had been transported to Syria where "Al-Nusra" Group managed to possess it under the knowledge and supervision of Turkey. In regard to such situation; have the American had an idea about this or is it that they had been fooled? Had the reason behind that they prepared themselves for the strike but did not execute it been that they came to know such information where Russia had interfered and had swapped the strike with delivering the chemical weapons for destroying them? What are the remains of the secrets, correspondences and information that had occurred between these countries and led the Syrian citizen towards becoming the victim of what had happened? The right & Wrong get lost during the international competitions where reaching the ends or targets become permitted through any other means. If the said arms stored in the Libyan warehouses have been smuggled and distributed on many circles; why it cannot be said that the Syrian regime itself used such arms to lead the course of events to the stage during which its storage becomes investigated and compared with the Libyan one for reaching the conclusion of that they are not identical and, thus, fooling the United Nations Team members. What about the other terrorist organizations such as Al-Qaeda, Daesh (i.e. The Islamic State in Iraq & Syria), Hezbollah and others located in Iraq, Sinai & North Africa? What if such weapon has become possessed by them? The game is dangerous. During an earlier stage, the United States had provided the Afghani Resistance parties which had been fighting the Soviet Union with Stinger missiles which had caused a revolutionary change through dropping many of the attacking military aircraft but had collected and purchased them again after the rise of Taliban and the US concern of that it may possess such arms. Has the same mistake been repeated in regard to the Libyan Chemical weapons that might have become out of control in regard to those who transported them and supervised its pathway? Have such chemical weapons been lost and found later in Syria or other countries where they can be used? Who shall be blamed if it has become clear that they have been smuggled? Will he be the Turkish President or the American President who supervised the transportation of such arms to secured or unsecured destinations? A lot had been said earlier about the loss or export of such arms. Germany had been accused by being the main supplier of the Chemical weapons for Saddam Hussein who had used then in Halabja. The same accusation had been addressed to North Korea during the disorder time of Soviet Union dissociation as it had been said that tens of kilograms of enriched Uranium had been transported to many destinations where the first beneficiary of them had been the Israeli Scientists. Which party can we blame during such disorder? Who shall be chased legally if the American journalist is revealing facts that have not been cared for by the foreign circles, especially Europe, The United States and Russia? Meanwhile, Israel does not fear or complain anymore of that it may be threatened through such arm. This means the accusation is not restricted on one state only, especially if we consider that Syria represents the center of the issue and the first affected victim from its consequences.
