It was Churchill who declared his intention to ally with the devil for the sake of achieving his victory during the 2nd World War. Britain's philosophers were, as well, the ones who legislated the principle of that the end justifies the means and that there are neither permanent friendships nor permanent hostilities but everlasting interests , in addition to that human rights law shall be inactivated or put aside in case of that a ganger is threatening its national security. In short; it is Britain which created world crises in the past and currently when it pushed some minorities towards immigrating to its colonies for enabling them to come to power, in addition to supporting its army and influence zones. The said minorities realized soon that they are in a state of war with the original citizens. This situation led to the spread of national and borders wars and, consequently, to dividing the unified country to many smaller states divided on the base of race or sect. Britain boasts that it had formed its empire through applying the dirty policy principal which means adopting the principal of legalizing the forbidden for the sake of achieving its targets. If we forget in our Arab region the "Sykes-Picot" & the division of "Cham" countries; we can't remove the British general mobilization declaration in all of its areas for creating the State of Israel from the memories of our generations. This means, in general, that it is impossible to provide a trust to the policy of a country that changes it s face every now & then. The British Sunday Times leaked some news about a Saudi-Israeli communications aiming at opening the Saudi Airspace for striking Iran. Before responding to this claim; we need to remind that Saudi Arabia has presented a project that had became an Arab project later which included comprehensive peace plan by which Israel can become a state merged with its Arab perimeter / surrounding countries together with a synchronous recognition under many agreements that stop the wars between the two parties and abroad. However, Israel refused the said offer under the claim of that it is protected by the European countries and the United States. Thus, the doctrine of its remaining as the absolute power before the Arabs or the other regional powers such as Turkey & Iran represents the justifying objection. In regard to communicating with it; it's not a new matter as it is mentioned, most of the times, for disturbing the (political) atmosphere. We have become used to such naïve tales. Iran is a Muslim country & we are against the party who tries to disturb its security. It is true that we are not in a state of good relationship with it due to many well known reasons but our Islamic morals prohibit us from asking the support of an enemy for striking a Muslim brother, even if the boycott reaches the level or state of no return. On the other hand, any military work may put the whole region in a state of a massive fire. There are no religious or sectarian considerations that make destroying all parties an acceptable adventure. We have been and are still standing against breaching the security through any way & from any external power. We have got the courage rather than the disguise. Have there been any dialogues or meetings between us and Israel; we would have justified them by that there are other Arab countries which already did that, including the Palestinians who are the most party in-charge of the cause as they have been and are still holding meetings and dialogues with it. It is refused / rejected that we are put within the suspicious conditions the way the British newspaper wanted. We know that we have been subject to a sever media war by the newspapers of the United States and Europe during the past weeks due to their wish of that we abandon our Arab duty, in addition to their resentment from our attitude of refusing the pressure practiced on us for affecting the independence of our decision and freedom, especially in regard to our stand with Egypt and our refusal of Security Council Membership. The said factors provided a motive to the imagination of those countries journals as they put us into the circle of accountability and presenting us as monsters that refuse the woman's right and support terrorism and whatever related to the relationship with non0muslims. At the same time, Britain is having solely the biggest and most important relationship with the Kingdom if compared with its relationships with the rest of Arab countries. Accordingly; if we are the counter party who is hated and forsaken; why are we the partners of those countries who paved the way for comprehensive relationships with them? We do not care about whatever said about us in spite of that it harms our reputation, putting into consideration the prevalence of these countries media. However; it is the truth that can dispel the suspicions and cancel the artificial doubts.
