I used to think that the evidence of miracles in the western history qualification is the method of their ability in the religious wars then putting aside the churches and opening all the society's horizons to different cultural diversities. This was not easy back then, and it was not east to stop any nonobjective desire before a Christian leadership. The colonial wars came inside the countries that accepted the submission of desperation under the harshness of the western ruling, it also came between the countries that are military advanced that wanted to contain the colonies from one side and to confirm its sovereignty on Europe. The Second World War was also the end of that harsh and aggressive behavior. The reality is that the Second World War was not the barrier between aggressive behaviors and understanding practices because there are still secret understandings that saves for the western countries the gain sources regardless this gains' type. But to reach them is not made through war fields, and America may be the only country that still believes in wars, but it mostly don't win in all what it seeks. Iraq for example where it defeated Saddam Hussain is still far away as a society from its connections, and in fact it is more close to be an enemy to it. Before Iraq there was Vietnam, Afghanistan and Pakistan in an indirect way. A special practice comes in which it is in its humanistic results harsher than wars, slave importing. It is something that no Asian or African country practiced the same way as the westerns did. They were not a mass of human show that get sold as in the Arab world before, rather they were shipped in huge ships that force them to leave Africa and force them to work as slaves in hot farm weathers that they don't want to work in. Moreover, there were no salaries other than abstinent foods. How did Europe go out with the beginning of the nineteenth century, before two centuries, from those dark horizons of behaviors that are far away from any humanistic sense? I see that "how" shouldn't be directed to Europeans that achieved modern humanistic and population excellence, rather towards the Arab world. How would it go out of this frightening mixture between diverse dangers that made its land an expansion of massive desperation in the independency of its humanistic existence?
