Despite the hardships and lack of objectivity in positions and events in the Arab world, there is what justifies the sarcasm, and besides it the multiple manifestations of blackmailing, frightening or non-objective justification of the successive danger context. It seems that the Arab national doesn't use his memory at all in most of his Arab presence, where he is driven by the current events, and it doesn't stop at the borders of listening what is being said while he is in the path of moving to the events or the misconception as if he new to the age facts, and thus he doesn't try to make any comparison between his past and current events, to see if he was seventy years ago better than what he is today or the opposite. I will not go far away towards a past of a lot of Arab societies that are drowned in conflicts of varying causes and dangers, but I'll stop at a television discussion that was shown by Al Arabia channel couple of weeks ago; and it was keen to have a neutral discussion where it hosted a Syrian from the inside and a Syrian from the outside. What I was shocked from that the inside Syrian was repeating statements that pointed to successive decisions, behaviors or positions of the Baath sect towards what is going on inside Syria, is there a Baath sect? Of course not, this sect shined in a limited period of time and disappeared since at least a third of a century. Who ruled Syria after that, regardless of the ruling type, where the sect that came after that was a minority sect, and we all know that Michelle Aflaq who established this sect with a shining presence didn't find a safe place to finish the rest of his life at other than Iraq, and besides who? Saddam Husain. Besides this is the contradiction that takes over you to see an Iranian president announcing couple of days ago his preparation to host an Islamic conference to Damascus, which is a strange position. Why didn't he say to the integration with Arab countries position that called for an objective and fair solution to end the violent confrontation between the country's army and the isolation groups of the citizens? The Iranian president believes that, with these funny and non-objective strategies, it is easy to bring the great Iran back to what it was before Islam, not by proposed objectivity and dealing but by using the Arabs differentiations for unrevealed hatred, I mean a number of Arab countries, and I don't imagine that he will achieve any success that insults the Gulf total if this total went towards the self potentials, the facts of its economic excellence and the objectivity of its social concepts, where there is no need to please the angered, and it is not necessary to hear the exaggerations of a protestor, because the Gulf provided evidences of goodwill and support qualifications, but to call for transforming it to fear paths or negative spending doesn't befit the Gulf excellence that will not be in a danger position throughout its history future as long as it reserves its potential qualifications and the distinguished awareness of its citizens.
