We agreed on naming the occupation of Palestine "Al Nakba" and the defeat of 1967 "Al Naksa", and the leaders titled themselves the Majestic, the Leader, the Undisputed, the King of Kings of Africa, the Icon Leader, Amir Al Mo'mneen and the list goes on, but those titles remained the same as the pictures of their owners and their actions' history, until removed by a revolution, coup or destiny. Those responsible for such actions handed us the first list of Palestinian refugees, and they are the only ones that were victims of an international action and Arab weakness. The sequence of the events led to a mass run away to the global refugee camps and the credit goes to those who titled themselves and displaced their people with the action of colonialism advocate traitors, those who cooperated with the enemy or sectarian people. Sudan displaced millions of people to poor countries that failed to maintain them, and they became victims of poverty and plagues or a target of weaponries. There are more than four million refugees from Iraq, which is quarter the population, who are outside their country since the Iraq- Iran war then the Kuwait occupation and lastly the civil war that the American occupation created between the different sectors. Then came the phase of struggle for the Syrian people that the Jordanian and Lebanon borders were closed in his face and maybe the Iraqi, and Turkey remained the only country that welcomed families. The weird thing is that the leaders of the countries that their people migration was the most kept declaring the union of one society and named their regimes democratic. The worst administrative corruption and segregation is when the governing power is the leading party or the sector that control the army leaders and security service and distribute the jobs according to the loyalties and not the qualifications. Now we entered the phase bequeathing of republics that claimed the Arab monarchies are retroactive and doesn't has the authority to exist. Arab revolutions showed extinction of one-dimensional ruling, and it's a value in its own if it managed to preserve the nation union especially Libya, Syria and Yemen. Those are the countries that stand on varying diversity inside its society, and the fear of dictatorship and the come back of sectarian ruling is valid. This doesn't remove the legitimacy of revolutions or turn them into a reason for condemnation, because those who created them were under a none-tolerated pressure and raised their rightful needs of freedom, dignity and sharing responsibilities in rights and duties. The success of the current phase is that the leadership will not be the one that enforces a title and takes it as an excuse to guardianship his people. Assuming that the variables came with sharp disadvantages, since the governments controlled authorities and ignored the public role, created the factors or revolutions, meaning that the revolutions accelerated the process that was to happen anyway. The conscious of the public remains the only option for countering any breakdown in a dark phase.
