In the past, the effects of killing the children arises when huge tension builds up and tragic revenge occur. The symbols of Arab revolution tragedies began with Mohammed Bouazizi, Tunisian peddler, then the tragedy of the young Egyptian Khalid Saeed, who was killed by former government police and finally, Hamza al-Khatib in Syria. Arab cities and capitals wore the mourning attire, and humanitarian protests took place. Israel, in the midst of these accelerating Arab conditions, where you do not need to report the facts to the outside world, created a sensation worldwide in killing Mohammed al-Dura and the Gaza blockade, where they cut off electricity and oil supplies. Two parties that are at war and openly despise each other, but for cities and villages to be deprived of electricity, water services and means of communication by their governments, including hospitals, is equivalent to what Israel is doing to the Palestinians in terms of torture and siege, and the tragedy is that they are only the enemies of the Arab authorities. The issue that the leaders are the divine gift for a flock of people, decisively with the most notorious leaders of the empires, the space of freedom remains the difficult equation between the people and gaining their rights or reduce the name and prestige of any arbitrarily system as long as the present tips balance the past as a stand against governments that no longer surrounds itself with screens and closed circuit on the people to get a fair ruling patent. And surprisingly the Europeans were the first in the past to use mercenaries in their long wars. We have seen Gaddafi follow this practice, and Syria used its allies in Iran and Hezbollah, and others demanded Arab countries, through the Arab League, to intervene or to uphold their voice. And we know that the issue before disseminating it in the Arab world is in fact enshrined internally only, and from the civil war experiences or those against the old colonialism, and the new we can't find comprehensive Arab contribution, except in cases against colonialism or occupation, and countries that may demand intervenes, has never played an active role in internal Arab disputes because, as political explanations state, it is the case resolved internally in such situations, and modern revolutions relate to this in general. From the French Revolution, through Bolshevism and Maoism, and Khomeini, these revolutions were not able to secure stability for their people except through installing democracy as a system and method of work. In the process of Arab citizens, calling for peaceful change and demonstrations without violence, we find the other side sends bullies and thugs, who are the city's criminals graduated from prison, to act as the interface in the repression, and when a soldier is killed, he is equal to one hundred citizens in the eyes of the Authority and which firstly a different view from humanitarian logic, and secondly provokes the National Right, which reduces to the situation to the manner which led the authorities to use mercenaries or non-national forces, and hiring inside thugs to strike and genocide citizens for the same goals . We are faced with scenes of surreal ratified by nightmares, but the pursuit will remain between the arbitrary and the citizens, and the latter is able to defy longer as long as they cling to their survival and freedom objective, because no matter how great the iron fist is, people are our leaders of freedom from colonialism and other grievances, and the principle to die for dignity is better than to live in narrow iron cages.
