After the consecutive revolutions, the picture of the Arab has internationally changed and the demands of freedom and democracy that were claimed to be fit exclusively to the west in the, have become so to the other countries of the world. It was said that Arabs are not originally ready for such a system, and that the reasons which lead them to be ruled by those oppressive ruling systems lie in the existence of a self-acceptance of such systems. This is refuted by the fact that India, with its miserable poverty, found democracy to be a compensating alternative for dictatorships, and is now standing on its feet after they have developed their educational tools to make a big specific leap in the social and economical development by means of a peaceful system. Here comes the question of whether it was the highly educated and sophisticated people who have publications on thoughts and philosophy who mobilized cities and villages to stand up in the face of the dictator leaderships, or it was the outcome of a new universal awareness that made people impose their values in a different way to the extent that the majority of half-illiterate people who cannot distinguish between a capital and a region went out by innate to liberate themselves. Further, the phenomenon of the literate influential Arab has completely vanished in the street because it is a mono voice that was changed by its culture into an element that is desperate to implement any change in the outstanding structures, and thus, establishing the concept of authority and fear. Much was said about the factors that influence humans such as the influences of the environment and the hierarchies of history. It was also said that people who kept ignorant were unready to implant the seed of development. Even sociologists were subject to a racist trend when they categorized nations based on a developed west and a backward east neglecting all of the world's civilizations which were born in the east. When Japan started creating the Asian developed model, the old notions turned into what seemed to be a revision, and concluded that Arabs and Africans cannot possess a vision for change alone. However, there are different analyses now assuring that the Arab person posses the success factors that are decided by generations. The shock and bewilderment were enough to decide that the idea of backwardness in the structures of nations in no longer valid, and is unjust classification. The biggest challenge lies in protecting these revolutions from being snatched by means of making formal changes of systems that might create successors of previous systems. Furthermore, the nation's youth who suffered crudity, poverty and homelessness should be creative in the upcoming work environment and should be watching out for any diversion that might kill their dream. What we witnessed in the previous systems is that they were surround by packs of security forces and corrupts, dedicating the tools which were meant to defend their people to practice mandate on their own people . We tried nationalization and witness the outcomes represented in a chaos of an uncontrolled openness, and a backing education and productivity, in addition to the prevalence of cultures of fawn and mercenary. Perhaps is it the first time where every Friday has become a day of eeriness rather than of dread. It is also the first time for people to take their role from which they had long been deprived to own the will to decide what to pose and declare without any fear from the state and its ascendancy after realizing that the factors of bringing the state down comes from the seeds of the generations to come.
