Iran wishes to be a regional power which acts according to sectarian and national motivations. It assumes that the neighboring region is fragile and valid to be its lebensraum. This methodology might be valid in the past when empires were established then came to an end later. This methodology is impossible to return back with the same concepts, ideologies and settings. Arab Shiites are not the Fifth Column who is used to serve Persia arrogance because citizenship is not made of national, ideological or tribal structure; otherwise, this will apply to Iran which contains different ideologies. Under the continuous suppression, the Arab world may interfere to protect the Arab minority as well as Turks, Azeri, Baluch...etc. In that manner, Sunnis in the Islamic World may interfere to protect the 30% who are considered the second power in Iran according to the ideologies. If we accept Iran excuses, do the tribes or other nationalities who want to impose plans to protect Yemen ancestry in Ethiopia have the right to interfere in the affairs of an independent country? Or can any racial African minority in a neighbor country permit them to wage a war for that? The Western Countries had protected the white minority in Africa especially South Africa by the old colonizing concepts but it failed because of human and historical reasons and found itself a racial power which is not viable. So, the interference of any party as occurred in the Soviet Union, Maghreb by French minority and Soviet republics by different parties made declaration of war taken without considering any world rules. As the opposition party explodes the Iranian streets and suppressed by the leader dictatorship, the success of Arab revolutions supports the protests in countries that lost their freedom and reached the poverty line. Freedom suppression was hindered by modern technology which spreads like plagues. Iran is not isolated from Arab and Islamic surrounding, or even the human civilization which supports the people against military or religious leadership. It is a candidate to a conflict between religious power and Persian nationalism which is raising the slogan of racial purity against the remaining minorities. As for Arab Gulf, Nejad appeared to condemn the existence of Al Jazeera Shield in Bahrain assuming that the meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of GCC is a result of the American pressure while America itself condemned the chaos in Bahrain; in other words, USA did not welcomed the gulf action. This proves that we are not under the tutelage of America; so, we will not allow Iran to say to us what to do and it must manage its own business and cracked internal affairs before advising others to do the same.
