What if Mao Zedong, the initiator of the big revolution and then cultural revolution, came back to life and found that it was a Tunisian young man named "Bouazizi" who forced the current Chinese government to oppress everything related to the Jasmine revolution, and that the last choice is represented in a set of public guns threatening the superpower of mobilizing demonstrations? As if history says that it is the Arab proletarian revolutionists that are going to undermine the Peasant revolt of China which shook the world, and as if history want to omit one revolt that upset the balance of power and opposed the soviet theory by considering it as imperialist with a Bourgeois cover, and an alteration of the Marxist origin. In Europe – which always resorted the Ten Commandments to spread democracy and the domination of the Western system as a necessity, besides considering Israel to be worth protection and support, and in the light of the absent Arab role in the life scene with dictatorships that did not have any contribution to the modern civilization, the change contradicted all the old thoughts where the press columns of the most radical right-wing anti-Arabs newspapers called on for the necessity of a quick reaction by the Arab countries overlooking the Mediterranean, and for adopting a European "Marshall Plan" to rebuild those countries for fear of having radical Islamic systems in place, or of the growth of the migration trend to Europe. Of the wonders of this age is having an Arab generation in Tunisia, Egypt, the Levant and the Arab Peninsula states that used to see Lenin and Mao before many decades as figures of a historical revolution that would achieve justice. Now, reality contradicts such an image, and transforms all patterns by representing an Arabic revolution as a revolution of nations taking the place of other revolutions that used to represent the greatest models of revolutions. Of the wonders also is how a new world, as described by global analysts, has been born on the Arab land leaving insularity into the universally common act of rebelling. The democratic West insisted to stand against achieving the Arab objectives towards freedom and democracy when its political and social research centers concluded that Arabs are biologically and mentally a copy of an ancient world, and are inefficient to enter the concept of democracy. So how would they be able to apply it? They tried to attribute that to the cultural nature of the Arab societies being peasantry and tribal, and to the religion and the language as two key factors, and a factor of bequeathing continuous ignorance, curbed growing and backwardness. The East with its nationalist, soviet, and Chinese revolts, even though history has not records of any enmities with the Arabs, attempted to present its pattern to represent a force of pressure on the Capitalist camp by means of public collisions led by the communist parties. With the decline of those waves, the East and the West were surprised of the new and unprecedented Arab phenomenon. The question here is: did that happen because the secret of the revolution which lies in the use of a technical tool that happened to "globalize" the revolution rather than making it regional? And even in a country like China, have the barriers vanished to the extent that its great wall might be shaken before what "Bouazizi" has done?! Undoubtedly, it is the revolt of history and time.
