Yesterday, I argued about the impossibility of finding peace with the state of Israel as long the fascistic gang is still in power there. I continue today with my analysis, relying on what I read in the Israeli press alone. The latter mirrors the views and thoughts of a sick and paranoid society, which also suffers from a tinge of insanity. An editorial in Yedioth Ahronoth, for instance, criticized the United Nations because of its “bias” against Israel, and because the organization allegedly does not note the human rights abuses in the Arab and Islamic countries, or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's suppression of the demonstrations in Iran. What does that have to do with the price of tea in China – as one would say? It is true that Arab countries, and most of the Islamic world, are undemocratic, while Ahmadinejad's government did indeed crush the demonstrations. But does that absolve Israel from responsibility for its continuing occupation and its killing of thousands of innocent people including women and children (in less than a month in the war on the Gaza, 1400 Palestinians were killed, most of whom being civilians, including more than two hundred women and 300 children). Meanwhile, the Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman is the exemplary representation of the state of Israel. He is a brothel guard from Moldova, and it is his gutter mentality that makes him give statements such as “North Korea fired three missiles while the international community continues obsessing with three settlements”, in which he also mentioned the settlements' names. Again, what does that have to do with the price of tea? The whole of Israel is an illegal settlement in the Palestinian territories, and I do not understand the link between a people under occupation, and the North Korean (or South Korean) missile affairs or the Iranian nuclear bomb (I hope that the Iranian government is lying and that the nuclear bomb is already in production). In this vein, both the editorial and Lieberman's statement betray a detachment from reality. There also definitely is a practice of Nazism by the survivors of Nazism and their descendants which they do not notice, as the reader will see in the following example: The meetings of the United Nations investigative committee convened over four days, where testimonies of Israelis and Palestinians and others were heard about the war on the Gaza Strip. The entire Israeli press condemned the committee, the United Nations General Assembly and the Human Rights Council, accusing them of being biased against Israel. But the United Nations is the vessel of democracy in the world, and when its resolutions condemn Israel time after time, this would be the judgment of the entire democratic world against Israel. It is a Likudian arrogance, or sheer Nazism, to think that the vast majority of the world is wrong, and that the occupation state of Israel is right. The above mentioned United Nations Committee is chaired by Richard Goldstone, a Jewish judge of South African origins. Its members include a British [female] judge, a Pakistani prosecution judge, and an Irish officer. Yet, the Israeli press managed to accuse the members of the Committee, especially its Chairman, of being biased against Israel, both as individuals and as a group. So should the committee be headed by Avigdor Lieberman or Meir Dagan, or even Benjamin Netanyahu, in order for Israel to approve of it? This split personality disorder becomes pure Nazism when the Israeli press talks about the witnesses: Some of them were Israelis complaining about the Qassam rockets (which killed three people in three years as opposed to thousands of Palestinian victims, and which destroyed a wall or a clinic in exchange for entire neighbourhoods). The witnesses also included Palestinians and Israelis who gave testimonies in favour of Palestinians and against their fascistic government. Nonetheless, I read in the Israeli press that the testimony by Noam Shalit, father of the captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, would have been enough to end the investigation in favour of Israel, had the committee been fair and unbiased. For years, I didn't have a better example than this of their Nazi mentality. There are more than ten thousand Palestinian prisoners and detainees in Israel, yet they are all less important than one Israeli soldier. His father laments his capture, yet thousands of Palestinian prisoners are less important than him alone, as if they don't have fathers, or mothers or children to cry for them, and as if there is none in the world that want them to be free. What's most frightening in all of the above is that the known fascism attributed to the Israeli Government has begun to find its way into the mainstream Israeli media which usually has a great deal of freedom more that the Arab media. Such a rampant disease is what makes the government and the media in Israel denounce organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch for condemning the Israeli war crimes in Gaza - Although Amnesty also condemned Hamas's rockets just to be objective (which caused three Israeli deaths as opposed to thousands of Palestinians as I had mentioned earlier). I say one last time that there can be no peace with the fascist government and the sick society in Israel until a “Rabinian” government lands in power and the Israeli society is healed or awakened.
