He owns the land and its wealth, the people, their minds and hearts. He owns the revolution and does not recognize the state, but it is “compensation” to the citizens of the eternal revolution which produced his “glory.” He believes that the most basic duty of the citizens is to love him, just because he is the commander who agreed to be the leader of the parish. Consequently, this parish should remain silent to please him in the republic whose reputation spread for being the “heaven of the eternal commander.” When he lifts his finger, damned are those who do not shout their love to him in the streets. Is shouting in itself not an act of freedom? But in any other situation, if the parish even breathes without the leader's authorization, it would be breathing in the lungs of conspiracy. He is the leader who gave the people a choice and did not confiscate their will: Either I or hell. It is the choice between hell and the inferno, which if won over the “madmen” will earn the submission of the Colonel's Jamahiriya throughout decades of fire, for which Saif al-Islam, Khamis and their brothers have been rehearsing while drawing the lessons from the “Friday of Wrath” of the Arabs. The “Muammar of Glory” recollected Omar Mukhtar and called on the people to take to the streets. The Colonel is angry. He does not like lies while all the television channels are “fabricating” the leader's epic with the rebels. The Libyans have caught the Bin Laden contagion. An entire population is being duped by “drug addicts”! This was said by the leader. The Libyans committed a sin and must be punished through extermination. The Jamahiriya, its people and its stones, all belong to the leader, and after he endured so much suffering with his people and accepted to lead them for four decades, he can no longer show any tolerance and will fight until the last one of them. What is required for the Jamahiriya of blood is another population that is not so ungrateful toward the leader. He is Muammar who kept the entire world busy with his “wisdom” until he surpassed the greatest people in history. And is there anyone who does not know the accomplishments of a leader who hates his people? From Benghazi to Tobruk, Derna, Tripoli and Al-Bayda, accounts of the massacres and terror are emerging, while the fists of the security apparatuses that are violating the Libyan people's humanity and lives are revealing these people's bravery in deterring the most hideous of crimes. And just as the Tunisians will go down in history as being the first Arabs to have toppled the wall of fear in the republics of blood, they will also be remembered as being the first to have launched a call of humanitarian – and not political – solidarity with the Libyans who are afflicted with the “eternal revolution” and on whose necks the “sacred” leader threatened to march. It is with massacres that the moral and humanitarian scandal in the Arab world is completed, after it remained the capital of the doctrine of the sole enemy, i.e. Israel. And each scandal is branched out into many in light of the total absence of awareness which was wanted to be idle, so that when the time comes, it does not stand between the leader and his people, but between the overwhelming “glory” in the Jamahiriya and the West which was the “godfather” of the Colonel's rehabilitation following the Lockerbie deal. It is the West which sold the leader the tools to consecrate the “revolution,” so that it is not threatened by the conspiracies of the “extremists.” It is the West which received the Colonel by opening up before him the capitals of human rights and democracies without any shame. The renewal of the “revolution” and its Jamahiriya has acquired sponsors in Washington and London, while the people have turned into “riff-raff” in the opinion of the author of the colored book. Mrs. Hillary Clinton scolded the leader against the backdrop of his speech, while the Security Council that is mobilized by the major states in the face of the “rogue” was not ashamed of a statement that touches humanity. What is the difference between the Rwanda or even the Darfur massacres and the ones committed in Benghazi and Al-Bayda? The leader will not miss out on the margin of forgiveness, at the expense of millions of people! He should thus curse the treachery of the West that has started to divest his regime of its “legitimacy” - quite timidly one may add - and curse the Arab League which did not disappoint him, he who broke up from Arabism that failed to learn from his revolution. The Libyans' affliction resides in this “glory” which has murdered tens of thousands of martyrs within days. This may be an exaggeration considering there is no neutral side to count the number of bodies. In any case, this is irrelevant since the time of the “holy march” has come. From Tobruk to Benghazi and Tripoli, the horrors of the genocide constitute the biggest mark of defeat and dupery for the West that is still dealing with the Arabs in accordance with its interests. In the face of the “Muammar of Glory” and the bloodshed, are the Arab youth not entitled to demand a joint charter for the defense of the Arab populations whenever a leader chooses to “cleanse” his country from its people? We have all learned how to cheer or scream behind isolated walls and Libya's people are our victims, all of us.
