REPUBLICANS are lining up behind a pointed political attack line: President Barack Obama is nationalizing American industry and socializing medicine. Drawing on the government's ownership stakes in auto giants, insurance companies and banks – and the billions of tax dollars at risk – the Republican Party is trying to develop wedge issues in the national debate over how to repair the economy and expand health insurance. It's a strategy they hope will pay off in campaigns for Congress next year and, in the process, help rein in the Democratic president's outsized influence. Democrats dismiss it as conservative sloganeering. Outnumbered, Republicans are trying to tap into negative public attitudes toward “socialism” and taxpayer bailouts. Government meddling in the private sector is “a bridge to socialism,” asserts Republican Sen. James Inhofe. “It's time to get the government out of the bailout business once and for all,” says House Republican leader John Boehner. Demonstrators outside Obama appearances are waving signs denouncing his supposed embrace of “socialism.” The Republican Party is portraying the health care effort – which Obama has made a top priority – and government bailouts as two faces of what they portray as a dangerous burst of governmental activism by Obama and a supportive Democratic Congress. No matter that the bailouts and nationalizations were begun under the Republican administration of George W. Bush. Or that the word “socialism” may not evoke the same degree of alarm among the public it once did, especially among younger voters. Still, Republicans point to polls that show that Obama's handling of the economy isn't his strongest card. “People are as two-minded as they always have been about the role of government,” said pollster Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center. “On the one hand, people want the government to do things. On the other hand, they worry and are very skeptical,” Kohut said Republicans might be able to tap into this skepticism. Of course, if Obama is perceived as fixing the economy and bringing about improvements in the health care system, “It will be difficult for Republicans to make gains on these issues,” Kohut said. Republicans have been doubling down on the strategy – used in the 2008 national election campaigns – that Democrats in general and Obama in particular are seeking to vastly expand government control over Americans' lives. Republican consultant Frank Luntz, who wrote a detailed strategy plan on the language of health care, suggests that Republicans use the term “Washington takeover.” While vague, it “grabs attention,” he says. “The vast majority of Americans who like the health care they have risk losing it when a government-run system takes over,” says Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell. Although the government does provide health care coverage to the poor and elderly, most Americans have private insurance, usually provided by their employers. However, 50 million Americans don't have any health care insurance at all. Obama ridicules the notion that he favors a step toward European-style socialism. “When you hear people saying, `socialized medicine,' understand I don't know anybody in Washington who is proposing that, certainly not me,” he said at a town-hall meeting on health care. “Socialized medicine would mean that the government would basically run all of health care. They would hire the doctors, they would run the hospitals. They would just run the whole thing. Great Britain has a system of socialized medicine. Nobody is talking about doing that, all right?” And Vice President Joe Biden said on NBC television on Sunday the Obama administration only views its ownership role as a temporary necessity. “We get the hell, the heck out as quickly as we can. As the president says, we don't want any part of running any of these companies,” Biden said.
