The terrorism of a country is a long going problem, where violating the law by a lawless country creates a problem that pushes the victim side, whether an organization, a country, or citizens that lack their rights, to make a worse reaction. Multiple countries in the previous years such as Israel got famous, where it works in specific methodical and professional assassination or kidnapping of its enemies, depending on the experiences of the countries that help it in the fields of spotting or exchanging information and providing it with the highest technologies. Syria comes next in first the accusation list Arab wise of killing a lot of Lebanese and Palestinians, and after it Iran became the center of facilitating and working on criminal plans with the motives of the gangs and not the country, and Iraq got burnt after invasion with the assassinations as a revenge of its army's defeat in the age of Saddam's ruling. The unhidden enmities also returned to anything related to Arabs even to those that belong to Shiite's doctrine. Revealing the crime of the attempt of killing the Saudi ambassador in Washington Adel Al Jubair and the assault on the Kingdom's embassy later on, as well as recruiting whom it thought involved in making and promoting drugs from the leaders of some Mexican gangs, and the process that the crime scene would be another country regardless of its size or international role is considered to be a disrespect of the international laws and agreements, but does Iran realize the dangers of such act and the hard consequences of it? If Iran thinks that it has long hands that reach the necks of others then it doesn't mean that it has the immunity by reaching to them, and the deterrent is not fear, but the moral nature by rejecting the practicing of crime, other wise the internal and external elements that surround Iran have a lot of flaws and paths, and the process of it choosing the kingdom as an enemy and a field to create problems with it is not new and not shocking, where its history is filled with lawbreaking acts, but this time it fell in the trap of a great country that the Iranian foolishness chosen to be in the core of the problem. The justification of it being an enemy to Iran, and it choosing a time of what it names to be its war with it is considered to be a fabrication to the mind and logic, where a country like that, which has evidences and followed the crime from the start cant mislead the international public view as long as it revealed the facts in front of the world. It is not the first time that Iran enters such a dilemma, whether what it names of exporting the revolution and targeting Arab and Islamic countries or sending its terrorists to sites that it wants to take its crimes to the same way it sponsors and shelters leaders from Al Qaeda despite its opposition to their doctrine but matches with them in the crime. This proves that the shield that Iran uses when putting Islam as a method is nothing more than a cloud of smoke that hides the chauvinism of the Iranians, which is the base in an illusion of the Iranian dominance on the Arab nation and Islamic world. The scandal of the attempt of assassinating the Saudi ambassador will not get wasted in the false Iranian justifications that claims that it is targeted and living the concern of conspiracies from Westerns if the evidences are there and it expects punishments of the size of the crime planner, and the case is revealed, where the government of Mullas is living an isolation and tense internal situation, and it wants through these crises to move its battles outside. Even if assuming that it wants to reduce the pressures on Syria, the reward depends on the act of making such follies.
