What is the benefit for a developed country who leads the human civilization in Europe and America when an extremist burnt the Holy Quran, a newspaper published caricature that insult our Messenger Mohamed (PBUH), a Jewish who try to demolish the Al-Aqsa Mosque, a doctor who tried to kill praying Muslims inside the Cave of the Patriarchs in Ramadan or some extremist Muslims burn churches, mosques, Hussein area...etc in return? If Taliban and Al-Qaeda are symbols of extremity and terrorism, Israel (as a religious government) is ranked as racial terrorists who believe that they are the Chosen People who is liable to classify other humans who are considered "the slaves of God's sons" (according to the Jewish beliefs). Neuron burnt Rome and Hulagu did the same in Baghdad and threw all the books of the libraries in River Tigris. Nowadays, several countries in the depth of great democracy depending on the fear of immigration from East Europe, East or West, the economy crisis or the Islamophopia in Europe societies. Some of the modern Arabic revolutions begin to alarm people: the Muslim extremists who are following Taliban, and other countries have no idea about their own project. The security possession concerns everybody because the effects in Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia and Libya may oblige us to face revolution trends especially because the many variables lead to street problems unless the government is managing the country affairs according to the desire of the street protestors who got out to fulfill some legitimate demands. But if the directions turned to be security chaos or snatching the revolution in favor of extremists, the demands will trend to risks. The world synchronized extreme events are risky because they are broadcasted in the mean time; so the Afghanistan protest started when the Quran is burnt, because the great fire fuel is the challenge to play with sacred things. We cannot think about the West which rouse the democratic ceiling above the sacred buildings and made the trial as a punishment for personal insult and nothing to punish the insults against religions because it is freedom of expression (according to them); but when this freedom clings to other noses, the reaction will be more cruel. Let's look at the democracy and freedom in countries that exceeded the legitimacy of other countries: does the freedom and democracy also mean the consideration of others feelings and not insulting their morals and sanctities to protect the world security not some religious persons? The expansion of religious conflicts and other holy constants is not considered by political mind, and the freedom is not limited to that but also the explosive feelings which can harm others.
