I believe that I can now compete with Montaser al-Zayat when it comes to defending Islamist groups or Muslims in general, because they seem to not know how to defend themselves. A few days ago, I defended Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, after several Likudnik websites that defend Israeli criminals accused him of being the equivalent of Adolph Hitler. I return to Sheikh Yusuf today because the campaign against him is still ongoing. The Jerusalem Post attacked him because he called for the destruction of Israel from Tahrir Square, while the audience all chanted ‘God is Great' in support of his call. These same websites also attacked Rashad al-Bayoumi and Kamal Helbawi, who are both Muslim Brotherhood leaders, after they declared their rejection of the peace treaty with Israel. I do not want to destroy Israel. I instead accept a Palestinian state on 22 percent of historic Palestine, and I agree with the Muslim Brotherhood that this encompasses the entire land, from the Sea to the River. I also fully support the stance of the Muslim Brotherhood in rejecting the peace treaty with Israel, and call for it to be abolished. (The Likudniks also attacked the Egyptian politician Ayman Nour, who is a former colleague and the former head of Al-Hayat's bureau in Cairo, after he said that the Camp David agreements have ended with the end of Mubarak's regime. I read strange things. For instance, the Likudniks are still objecting, even today, to the Israeli withdrawal from Sinai. As an example of this, I chose an article entitled “Egypt's “Unholy” Claim to the Sinai”, written by David Isaac, i.e. [his name indicates that] he is a Likudnik Jew. In the article, he rejected Anwar Sadat's ‘claim' that Sinai is a holy land, and a part of Egypt, and said, “The fact of the matter is that Egypt has never had more than a tenuous historical connection to the Sinai Peninsula….But Israel has at least as much right – indeed more right – to Sinai than Egypt.” But Israel has no right to Israel itself. It is a made-up country established atop Palestinian lands. And how does the American Likudnik support his argument? The answer would have been funny, were it not for the grave nature of this issue. He quoted one of Menachem Begin's advisors, i.e. the known terrorist war criminal. His name is Shmuel (i.e. Samuel) Katz, the author of a book entitled “Battleground: Fact and Fantasy in Palestine”. The book dates back to the time of British colonialism in the region, which paved the way for the subsequent Zionist colonialism. He also quoted a letter sent to The Times in 1957, written by a former advisor to the British Colonial Office. So what is the name of advisor? It's Richard Meinertzhagen, i.e. he is one of them. Thus, the evidence of Egypt's loose ties with Sinai involves the actions of none other than British colonialism, and what the Zionist occupiers quoted each other as saying, as they murder women, children, and destroy and commit massacres. Perhaps I would not have written about this topic today, were it for the fact that David Isaac also quoted the Torah on the issue of the Sinai, and quoted Genesis, Joshua and Chronicles to say that the borders of Israel begin with the eastern tributaries of the Nile Delta (Wake up people, before you find these people in your midst). I say in the clearest possible terms that the Torah is not actual history, but a bunch of religious myths. The Jewish prophets never existed in our countries, from Abraham, to Moses, Joshua, David and Solomon. The prophets with these names mentioned in the Quran are different from the Jewish prophets, since the stories mentioned in these two books are different. Here, I dare Dr. Zahi Hawass again, or whoever succeeds him, to find us one single trace of Jewish presence in Egypt or the Sinai. There were Jews in the entire region, yes, but they did not establish states or kingdoms. They did not even have traces in Jerusalem itself. They existed before their prophets, whose history was fabricated later, and Judaism perhaps is the only religion that preceded its prophets. I leave the reader with two relevant books on this subject, and perhaps I will revisit them in more detail in the future: - “Jerusalem: the Biography”: Written by Simon Sebag-Montefiore, a prominent Jewish historian, this book was acclaimed by critics. However, I read in one review that the book talks about the sack of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple in AD70, and that Titus, the Roman general, ordered 500 Jews to be crucified each day until the Romans ran out of wood. But according to the history that I studied, some chronicled by Jews, neither Solomon nor his temple had ever existed, and both have no traces whatsoever, and are thus yet another biblical myth. -“Occupation of the Territories: Israeli Soldiers' Testimonies 2000-2010”. This book contains the truth about Israel, as told by Israeli soldiers who saw or committed war crimes against the Palestinians that started before the first occupation, and that are still being committed every day. This is actual history, of which witnesses are alive and of which victims are known. As for the other history, it is nothing but biblical myths concocted to justify the theft of the land from its inhabitants. [email protected]
